Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28040
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gulam Smdani | - |
dc.contributor.author | Muhammad Remanul Islam | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sairul Izwan Bin Safie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmad Naim Ahmad Yahaya | - |
dc.contributor.author | (UniKL MITEC) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-05T02:53:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-05T02:53:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-07-05 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28040 | - |
dc.description | This article is index by Scopus. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Energy systems are progressive and revolutionary for their alternative resources, technical developments, demands, effectiveness and environmental effects. The recently published research's goal is to assess and evaluate the systems that are already in operation and those that will be in the future. Energy can be stored as electrical energy such as supercapacitors (SCs) and superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) etc., mechanical energy such as pumped hydro energy storage (PHES), compressed air energy storage (CAES) and flywheel energy storage (FES) etc., chemical energy, electrochemical energy such as batteries and fuel cells etc., and thermal energy. Performance of these energy storage systems (ESSs) have been evaluated in terms of energy density, power density, power ratings, capacitance, discharge-time, energy-efficiency, life-time and cycling-times, and costs. Supercapacitors provide highest power density (>10,0000 W/l), while hydrogen fuel cells provide highest energy density (500-3000Wh/l) among other EESs. Batteries also provide high energy density(200-500Wh/l). The energy efficiency is found highest in SMES system (95-98%), and lowest in TES system (30-50%). Moreover, batteries and supercapacitors have the cycle efficiency above 90%. PHES and CAES seem to be the most cost-effective energy storage systems reviewed in this analysis in terms of $/kWh. In addition, power-based capital cost of supercapacitors is lower (100-300$/kW) compared to energy-based capital cost of supercapacitors (300-2000$/kWh). In comparison with power-based capital costs, the energy-based capital cost of batteries is lower, which is 150-400$/kWh for Lead-acid battery, and <300$/kWh for Li-ion battery. This essay may help researchers in choosing the advanced energy storage technologies for relevant purposes. | en_US |
dc.subject | batteries and supercapacitors | en_US |
dc.subject | energy density | en_US |
dc.subject | energy storage device | en_US |
dc.subject | energy storage systems | en_US |
dc.subject | long duration energy storage | en_US |
dc.title | Performance Evaluation of Advanced Energy Storage Systems | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 Performance Evaluation of Advanced Energy Storage Systems.pdf | 33.52 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.