Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/31475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTippett, Victoria L.-
dc.contributor.authorTattersall, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorNorain Ab. Latif-
dc.contributor.authorKaran M. Shah-
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Michelle A.-
dc.contributor.authorGartland, Alison-
dc.contributor.author(UniKL RCMP)-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T03:43:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-27T03:43:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-
dc.identifier.citationTippett, V. L., Tattersall, L., Norain Ab. Latif, Shah, K. M., Lawson, M. A., & Gartland, A. (2022). The strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic review. Oncogene, 42(4), 259–277.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02529-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn09509232-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41388-022-02529-x-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.unikl.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/31475-
dc.description.abstractOver the last 40 years osteosarcoma (OS) survival has stagnated with patients commonly resistant to neoadjuvant MAP chemotherapy involving high dose methotrexate, adriamycin (doxorubicin) and platinum (cisplatin). Due to the rarity of OS, the generation of relevant cell models as tools for drug discovery is paramount to tackling this issue. Four literature databases were systematically searched using pre-determined search terms to identify MAP resistant OS cell lines and patients. Drug exposure strategies used to develop cell models of resistance and the impact of these on the differential expression of resistance associated genes, proteins and non-coding RNAs are reported. A comparison to clinical studies in relation to chemotherapy response, relapse and metastasis was then made. The search retrieved 1891 papers of which 52 were relevant. Commonly, cell lines were derived from Caucasian patients with epithelial or fibroblastic subtypes. The strategy for model development varied with most opting for continuous over pulsed chemotherapy exposure. A diverse resistance level was observed between models (2.2–338 fold) with 63% of models exceeding clinically reported resistance levels which may affect the expression of chemoresistance factors. In vitro p-glycoprotein overexpression is a key resistance mechanism; however, from the available literature to date this does not translate to innate resistance in patients. The selection of models with a lower fold resistance may better reflect the clinical situation. A comparison of standardised strategies in models and variants should be performed to determine their impact on resistance markers. Clinical studies are required to determine the impact of resistance markers identified in vitro in poor responders to MAP treatment, specifically with respect to innate and acquired resistance. A shift from seeking disputed and undruggable mechanisms to clinically relevant resistance mechanisms may identify key resistance markers that can be targeted for patient benefit after a 40-year wait.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.titleThe strategy and clinical relevance of in vitro models of MAP resistance in osteosarcoma: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.