DSpace Repository

Time Step Sensitivity Analysis of a Flow-Driven Savonius Rotor

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zakaria, A.
dc.contributor.author Ibrahim, M.S.N
dc.contributor.author (UniKL MIDI)
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-17T06:48:04Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-17T06:48:04Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation Zakaria, A., Ibrahim, M.S.N. (2020). Time Step Sensitivity Analysis of a Flow-Driven Savonius Rotor. Advances in Material Sciences and Engineering, 225-232. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25279
dc.description This article index by Scopus en_US
dc.description.abstract The difficulty in choosing the right combination of time step and time increment in simulating a flow-driven rotating rotor is largely attributed to the wind speed dependent time constant which is defined as the elapsed time for the rotor to reach its stable rotational speed. Therefore, a combination of time step and time increment for one wind speed may not work for other wind speeds. A CFD sensitivity analysis of a Savonius rotor is conducted in this study in order to improve its simulation accuracy in predicting the rotor rotational speed by manipulating the time step for a wind speed range of 2–6 m/s. An optimum combination of time step and time increment for minimum error for first are obtained by CFD analysis. Based on a reference parameter of 6 m/s wind speed, other time step for 2, 3, 4 and 5 m/s wind speeds were calculated using the number of revolutions required to reach a steady state rotational speed. The resulted rotational speeds generated were then compared with the actual experiment in an open circuit wind tunnel. It is observed that the rotor only starts to rotate just after zero-time step and gradually accelerates until it reaches a constant rotational speed. Consequently, higher time step is required for low speeds and the converse is true for the high speeds. Lower time step can result in non-convergence solution. The result shows that the predicted RPM of Savonius rotor can be made close to the experimental data at the expense of higher computing time. Accuracy of predicted RPM is within 5% as compared to 20% without sensitivity analysis. en_US
dc.publisher Springer, Singapore en_US
dc.subject Time step en_US
dc.subject Sensitivity analysis en_US
dc.subject Flow-driven en_US
dc.subject Savonius en_US
dc.title Time Step Sensitivity Analysis of a Flow-Driven Savonius Rotor en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.conference.year 2020 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account