DSpace Repository

A Comparative Performance Analysis of Manet Routing Protocols in Various Propagation Loss Models Using NS3 Simulator

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sabra A. Saleh
dc.contributor.author Megat F. Zuhairi
dc.contributor.author Hassan Dao
dc.contributor.author UniKL MIIT
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-24T08:57:22Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-24T08:57:22Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06
dc.identifier.citation Saleh, S. A., Zuhairi, M. F., & Dao, H. (2020). A Comparative Performance Analysis of Manet Routing Protocols in Various Propagation Loss Models Using NS3 Simulator. Journal of Communications, 537-544. doi:10.12720/jcm.15.6.537-544 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 17962021
dc.identifier.uri http://www.jocm.us/show-240-1559-1.html
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.unikl.edu.my/jspui/handle/123456789/24841
dc.description This articles index by Scopus en_US
dc.description.abstract The standard design for efficient routing protocols that could provide the optimum value of performance for various network scenarios, particularly affecting the radio propagation is a great challenge. The aim of the paper is to investigate the impact of simulating MANET routing protocols with using various propagation model. It is because typical MANET studies assume the effect of radio propagation is negligible, therefore leading to insignificance simulation results. The choice of routing protocols are Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) and Distance Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV), which has reactive and proactive mechanism respectively. The performance of routing protocols are quantified with three different radio propagation model i.e. Friis, Two-ray ground and Nakagami. Each model replicate the condition of open space, sub-urban and urban area. Typical performance metrics are used, which are packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay and throughput using NS-3 simulator. Result indicates that various propagation loss models may substantially impact performance routing protocols. The AODV routing protocol shown higher throughput as compared to DSDV regardless of propagation model. The AODV also generates higher PDR when Friis and Two-ray Ground are employed. On the other hand, DSDV routing protocol shows lower delay, lower throughput and higher PDR only when Nakagami model is used. In general, specific path loss condition can affect the MANET routing protocol performance. This study provides a comparative result using NS3 of two extreme routing protocol approach, i.e. pro-active and reactive which can be used as a reference point for further development of routing protocol in various ad hoc network applications and scenarios. en_US
dc.publisher Engineering and Technology Publishing en_US
dc.subject Mobile ad-hoc network en_US
dc.subject propagation loss models en_US
dc.subject AODV en_US
dc.subject DSDV en_US
dc.subject NS3 simulator en_US
dc.title A Comparative Performance Analysis of Manet Routing Protocols in Various Propagation Loss Models Using NS3 Simulator en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account